De Rerum Natura
Lucretius
Lucretius. De Rerum Natura. William Ellery Leonard. E. P. Dutton. 1916.
- Besides, if nature of soul immortal be,
- And able to feel, when from our frame disjoined,
- The same, I fancy, must be thought to be
- Endowed with senses five,- nor is there way
- But this whereby to image to ourselves
- How under-souls may roam in Acheron.
- Thus painters and the elder race of bards
- Have pictured souls with senses so endowed.
- But neither eyes, nor nose, nor hand, alone
- Apart from body can exist for soul,
- Nor tongue nor ears apart. And hence indeed
- Alone by self they can nor feel nor be.
- And since we mark the vital sense to be
- In the whole body, all one living thing,
- If of a sudden a force with rapid stroke
- Should slice it down the middle and cleave in twain,
- Beyond a doubt likewise the soul itself,
- Divided, dissevered, asunder will be flung
- Along with body. But what severed is
- And into sundry parts divides, indeed
- Admits it owns no everlasting nature.
- We hear how chariots of war, areek
- With hurly slaughter, lop with flashing scythes
- The limbs away so suddenly that there,
- Fallen from the trunk, they quiver on the earth,
- The while the mind and powers of the man
- Can feel no pain, for swiftness of his hurt,
- And sheer abandon in the zest of battle:
- With the remainder of his frame he seeks
- Anew the battle and the slaughter, nor marks
- How the swift wheels and scythes of ravin have dragged
- Off with the horses his left arm and shield;
- Nor other how his right has dropped away,
- Mounting again and on. A third attempts
- With leg dismembered to arise and stand,
- Whilst, on the ground hard by, the dying foot
- Twitches its spreading toes. And even the head,
- When from the warm and living trunk lopped off,
- Keeps on the ground the vital countenance
- And open eyes, until 't has rendered up
- All remnants of the soul. Nay, once again:
- If, when a serpent's darting forth its tongue,
- And lashing its tail, thou gettest chance to hew
- With axe its length of trunk to many parts,
- Thou'lt see each severed fragment writhing round
- With its fresh wound, and spattering up the sod,
- And there the fore-part seeking with the jaws
- After the hinder, with bite to stop the pain.
- So shall we say that these be souls entire
- In all those fractions?- but from that 'twould follow
- One creature'd have in body many souls.
- Therefore, the soul, which was indeed but one,
- Has been divided with the body too:
- Each is but mortal, since alike is each
- Hewn into many parts. Again, how often
- We view our fellow going by degrees,
- And losing limb by limb the vital sense;
- First nails and fingers of the feet turn blue,
- Next die the feet and legs, then o'er the rest
- Slow crawl the certain footsteps of cold death.
- And since this nature of the soul is torn,
- Nor mounts away, as at one time, entire,
- We needs must hold it mortal. But perchance
- If thou supposest that the soul itself
- Can inward draw along the frame, and bring
- Its parts together to one place, and so
- From all the members draw the sense away,
- Why, then, that place in which such stock of soul
- Collected is, should greater seem in sense.
- But since such place is nowhere, for a fact,
- As said before, 'tis rent and scattered forth,
- And so goes under. Or again, if now
- I please to grant the false, and say that soul
- Can thus be lumped within the frames of those
- Who leave the sunshine, dying bit by bit,
- Still must the soul as mortal be confessed;
- Nor aught it matters whether to wrack it go,
- Dispersed in the winds, or, gathered in a mass
- From all its parts, sink down to brutish death,
- Since more and more in every region sense
- Fails the whole man, and less and less of life
- In every region lingers.
- And besides,
- If soul immortal is, and winds its way
- Into the body at the birth of man,
- Why can we not remember something, then,
- Of life-time spent before? why keep we not
- Some footprints of the things we did of, old?
- But if so changed hath been the power of mind,
- That every recollection of things done
- Is fallen away, at no o'erlong remove
- Is that, I trow, from what we mean by death.
- Wherefore 'tis sure that what hath been before
- Hath died, and what now is is now create.
- Moreover, if after the body hath been built
- Our mind's live powers are wont to be put in,
- Just at the moment that we come to birth,
- And cross the sills of life, 'twould scarcely fit
- For them to live as if they seemed to grow
- Along with limbs and frame, even in the blood,
- But rather as in a cavern all alone.
- (Yet all the body duly throngs with sense.)
- But public fact declares against all this:
- For soul is so entwined through the veins,
- The flesh, the thews, the bones, that even the teeth
- Share in sensation, as proven by dull ache,
- By twinge from icy water, or grating crunch
- Upon a stone that got in mouth with bread.
- Wherefore, again, again, souls must be thought
- Nor void of birth, nor free from law of death;
- Nor, if, from outward, in they wound their way,
- Could they be thought as able so to cleave
- To these our frames, nor, since so interwove,
- Appears it that they're able to go forth
- Unhurt and whole and loose themselves unscathed
- From all the thews, articulations, bones.
- But, if perchance thou thinkest that the soul,
- From outward winding in its way, is wont
- To seep and soak along these members ours,
- Then all the more 'twill perish, being thus
- With body fused- for what will seep and soak
- Will be dissolved and will therefore die.
- For just as food, dispersed through all the pores
- Of body, and passed through limbs and all the frame,
- Perishes, supplying from itself the stuff
- For other nature, thus the soul and mind,
- Though whole and new into a body going,
- Are yet, by seeping in, dissolved away,
- Whilst, as through pores, to all the frame there pass
- Those particles from which created is
- This nature of mind, now ruler of our body,
- Born from that soul which perished, when divided
- Along the frame.